Overview
In this concluding session, Eiko Ikegami reflects on the value of bringing scientific inquiry, spiritual experience, and Asian and Western traditions into genuine critical dialogue, while Piet Hut argues that science offers a powerful but incomplete view because it has not yet fully incorporated meaning, values, beauty, and subjective experience. The discussion examines whether logic develops from experience or exists independently of it, comparing Western logic and quantum logic with Buddhist syllogisms, consequential reasoning, Dharmakirti’s epistemology, and Nagarjuna’s fourfold analysis. Robert Livingston and Tu Weiming return to the importance of embodied experience and the interaction between analytical knowledge and inner cultivation, while audience questions address divination, unfiltered awareness, the Buddha’s refusal to answer certain cosmological questions, and whether science could eventually investigate or simulate enlightenment. The dialogue closes with the Dalai Lama expressing gratitude for the scientists’ openness and emphasizing that knowledge should ultimately be guided by compassion, responsibility, and the shared effort to benefit humanity.
- Dialogue 610 sessions
- October 31, 1997Dharamsala, India
- ML6-day5-06311997-Hut_Discussion |docx|



