Mind & Life Summer Research Institute: Day 5

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

The scientific exploration resumed Friday, following a day of silence, including contemplative practices of mediation and walking mediation, along with meditation instruction and contemplative instructions from contemplatives Sharon Salzberg, Will Kabat-Zinn, Geshe Dorji Damdul and Tsoknyi Rinpoche.

L1050499

The First Morning Session of Day 5 was Teacher-Student Interactions: The Role of Mindfulness, by Bridget Hamre, Ph.D.. which explored effective and ineffective teaching methods v is a vis a teacher’s role in fostering students’ social, self-regulatory and cognitive development.

Hamre talked about the extreme variability in the kind of experiences that children have in classrooms and how that challenges teachers as well as how teachers should be recognized and respected for their work. “Teacher effectiveness is the buzz word of the day,” she said, “and in some ways only measures how well students are doing, but maybe we should also pay attention to what the teachers are doing that’s working.”

L1050438

She said that there are three domains of interaction that are important: emotional support, classroom organization and instructional support and that teachers who received consultation in these areas versus just getting information off of a website had increased sensitivity to their students where as the web-only group had decreased sensitivity over time.

The Second Morning Session was a panel discussion on Teacher Programs including Robert Roeser, Ph.D., Patricia Jennings, Ph.D. and Linda Lantieri, M.A.

Jennings is piloting CARE (Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education) under a development grant from the U.S. Department of Education. “We are looking at the mediating factors that are really important in social and emotional competence in teachers,” Jennings said. “We know these contribute to a healthy classroom climate and that, in turn, is related to improved outcomes in kids.

Jennings described interpersonal mindfulness in the classroom as including listening with full attention, present centered awareness, openness, non-judgement and acceptance, self-reflection, open –heartedness and compassion.

Roeser discussed SMART (Stress Management and Relaxation Techniques in education). “It’s amazing how often reforms try to bypass teachers,” he said, “almost like we make teacher-proof curriculum. But in terms of thinking about what makes a quality teacher, we know that content knowledge – what you are teaching – is important, pedagogical content knowledge – how you teach – is important, and developmental knowledge – knowing the developmental characteristics of the students you are teaching is also important.”

Lantieri discussed her long history in education and shared some poignant and illuminating feedback from teachers and students following 911 in part as evidence that the teacher-student system needs to accommodate the dynamic and unplanned experiences in addition to curriculum. “The thread throughout all my time with children is how to have an expanded version of what we mean as an educated person,” she said. “In particular, the dimension of social and emotional learning is key.”

The First Afternoon Session featured Trish Broderick, Ph.D., Sat Bir Khalsa, Ph.D., Mark Greenberg, Ph.D., Kim Schonert-Reichl, Ph.D., and Will Kabat-Zinn, M.A., and was a panel discussion on Developing and Evaluating Contemplative Practices for Children and Youth.

L1050475

Broderick discussed the BREATHE program (Body, Reflections, Emotions, Attention, Take it as it is, Healthy mind habits, Empowerment). “The heart of the curriculum is mindfulness,” Broderick said, “as a way of helping young people experience their life in a different way. Kids routinely say, ‘Everyone tells me to stop stressing out but no one tells me how.’ We think that the mindfulness-based curriculum can offer value for many reasons: dealing with the ups and downs, stress reductions, executive function; there is a real advantage to knowing your emotions as they arise.”

Khalsa clarified what truly is yoga versus the perception of it. “To the media and the public image, yogoa is a physical practice,” he said. “But the original yoga is a practice of meditation, mindfulness and awareness. The practices of deep relaxation and the physical postures are all for enhancing the mediation and mindfulness.”

Khalsa’s research is based on bringing yoga to the school curriculum, where he found improved anger control and resilience as well as a stable level of negative affect with conversely increased in the non-yoga control group. “We are really seeing a preventative effect for these kids,” he said.

L1050435

Greenburg conceded that he did not get the result he expected from his yoga study, and that they may have to consider investigating different parameters going forward. “I was naïve about what yoga might do and what our population was like,” he said. “For example, many of the kids are overweight and have asthma, and just the breath itself was an issue. It may be that basic health effects may be as important to measure as some of the mental health effects.”

Schonert-Reichl runs the MindUp program in Vancouver which has a current curriculum for grade and middle school, but which she looks to expand to more grades. “The program was designed in 2005 and includes different research and theories in the areas of neuroscience, social and emotional learning, positive psychology and mindfulness training,” she said. “We started in 2005 with 17 teachers trained and now there are 800 teachers trained. Some of the effects on elementary school students are well-being and prosocial behavior.”

Kabat-Zinn talked about his personal background in meditation and the organic evolution of his program of bringing mindfulness meditation to incarcerated youth, first in New York City and then in California. He pointed out that with this population, tactful approaches must be taken. “In the prisons, we also meditate, but that often comes later,” he said. “The relationship comes first and I have found that all of the qualities we are trying to achieve with mindfulness can be present in everything; it has to do with being intimate with what is really at heart, an authentic form of love that is not the soft love rejected by these men. When that shift happens; if there has been a foundation laid or seeds planted, they kind of know where to go when they are ready.”

In a Special Afternoon Session, Geshe Dorji Damdul initiative a comparative discussion between Buddhist studies and modern scientific studies, particularly physics. After giving an introduction to Buddhism as a primer, he explored the Buddhist relative and relational points of view on perspective vis a vis quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity.

L1050164

“So, is there the moon, when no one looks at it?” he queried. “According to quantum theory, we cannot say yes or no, until it comes into contact with an observer. So from this point of view the existence makes sense only in relation to an observer.”

Delving deeper he outlined the structure His Holiness the Dalai Lama uses to explain the interdependent, relational world called Dependent Origination. The three parts are:

1. Causality (causes and conditions)

2. Parts make up the whole

3. Imputation by the mind

“The existence of anything, including the self, makes sense only through dependence on many factors,” he said. “And out of these factors, the most important factor is the factor of the designating mind.”

L1050216

After dinner, Francisco J. Varela Awardees presented a Data Blitz, each with three minutes to introduce their current work and findings followed by poster sessions in the auditorium. The presenters and topics this evening were:

1. Maria Molfino, Meditation and Pranayama Breath Training in High School Students: Effects on Self-Monitoring and Self-regulation

2. Jessica Noggle, A Semester-Long Yoga Intervention Maintains Mental Health of Adolescents in a High School

3. Alison Parker, The Moment Program: Mindfulness-Based, Middle School Academic Achievement Program

4. Janis Kupersmidt, Mindfulness Program for Substance Abuse Prevention for Elementary School Students

5. Geoffrey Soloway, Role of Mindfulness Training in Initial Teacher Education

6. Kathryn Byrnes, Contemplative Pedagogy in Teacher Education

7. Karen Davis, A Longitudinal Mediation Model of the Mechanisms of Change Within a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program

8. Irene McHenry, CORE skills + CORE habits of mind = Effective, Accessible Teaching and Learning

9. Angela Wilson, Standardizing a Yoga Intervention for Research: A Preliminary Study

10. Angeline Lillard, Montessori and Mindfulness

11. Ellen Katz, Attending to Clinical Social Work Practice: Mindful Attention as Holistic Competence

L1050303

ML XX - Day 3 - The Conclusion

Sunday, April 11th, 2010

Session 5

The final session of ML XX began with Roshi Joan Halifax quoting His Holiness from years ago – “Compassion is not a luxury, it is a necessity for human beings to survive.” Moving on to the sole formal presentation of the session, William George of Harvard Business School spoke of compassionate, authentic leadership. In his view it is essential for a healthy society. He sees the global financial mess not as an economic failure, but a spiritual failure; people’s desire for more and more satisfaction derived from materialism led down a path of greed and destruction. There is a loss of confidence in our leaders today, but failures in leadership ultimately come from leaders who place their self-interest ahead of others, inevitably causing great damage.

Audience of Mind & Life XX

Audience of Mind & Life XX // Photo Courtesy of Manuel Bauer

However, on the bright side, we are seeing the emergence of a new type of leadership, and this growing style is no longer based on ‘Top Down’ management – it is based on empowerment. The job of a leader is to serve, not to exert brute authority. The mission of organizations should be to serve society, not shareholders, according to Mr. George. Over the long term, this is what sustains performance.

But leaders are not born or made, they are developed. Bill asked the Dalai Lama, “How do you think we can develop more leaders?” His Holiness replied, “I believe it comes from the training of inner values. Which many of you out there may already know, but you may not be fully convinced. I think mainly education will help development. With proper thought, we can make education and other fields develop more compassionate people. Even Hitler didn’t start out evil from birth; it was his development and the circumstances of his life that allowed him to become who he was. Though the media in Jerusalem made it sound like I called him a ‘positive person’ when I first said this.”

His Holiness continued, “You should spread these ideas about this type of leadership through talks, to the media, so that they are well known. Make a list of the qualities that this leader would have and list them ‘A, B, C, and so on.’ And then when people go to elections, they can take this list and judge who their leaders might be based on this list!”

Richard Davidson returned to the stage and took a moment to thank His Holiness for making this twentieth Mind & Life dialogue possible. “This could never have happened with anyone else. No other world leader has spent so much time in dialogue with scientists,” he said to commanding applause. “Well, I don’t have a country to run,” joked His Holiness. “I have been quite free!” Thupten Jinpa chimed in, “He does it partly to pass the time!” After summarizing the first

session’s scientific findings, he said, “Over these sessions, we’ve seen that in practice as well as in basic research that there are distinct gender differences when it comes to altruism and compassion. Why do you think that is?”

The Dalai Lama speaking to the audience of ML XX

The Dalai Lama speaking to the audience of ML XX // Photo Courtesy of Manuel Bauer

“I think the neurons are the same, organs are the same,” His Holiness mused after a moment. “The Buddha would have wanted to give equal opportunities to men and women. Discrimination has often been in the way of equality. Masculine traits have been associated as strength. Feminine is wisdom. We must develop toward a ‘mother-centered being;’ she would be the ultimate source of affection. Over this meeting we have been learning that women biologically have more sensitivity to this. Throughout evolution, leadership only came recently, when groups evolved to become more complex. Power stepped in and kept stability, which pushed education and compassion to more secondary roles.”

“I’ve learned much from living in India – liberty, democracy.” he continued. “Because so many of the thoughts and ideas I have had developed while in India, I now consider myself a son of India. Which always irritates my bosses in China!” He also said that intelligence alone is not enough; we need more compassion. Education will help bring equality to males and females. Women should take more of the active leadership roles. “Although,” he quipped, “some females – not so compassionate!”

Ernst Fehr thought of some challenges for the future. “What in Buddhism could be translated to the context of this conference?” he asked His Holiness.

“It is clear that we need different religions,” began the Dalai Lama’s response. “They have different perspectives but produce similar effects. A Muslim friend told me how a true practitioner must love all living creatures. We have to tackle the root cause of the problems in economic systems. We must recognize secular ethics. There is Buddhist science, Buddhist philosophy and Buddhist religion. Leave out the religion and look at the Buddhist science. Buddhism brings the necessity of compassion to social sciences. Your happiness is related to others’ happiness. All interconnected. Buddhist science provides better knowledge about emotion.” He continued, “However, we should respect all religions; do not try to convert people. Respect. Is Buddhism useful for economics in society? No. But take the values and perspectives of a religious person, and utilize that.”

His Holiness thanked everyone for such an important conference, and he expressed how encouraged he felt with what had been discussed. Thus ended Mind & Life XX: Altruism and Compassion in Economic Systems. By all accounts, there were great dialogue, very insightful research presentations, examples of real world economic compassion and happiness with how it all intertwined. Tashi Delek!

Photo Courtesy of Manuel Bauer

ML XX - Day 2

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Session 3
“What are the recent most important findings from economic research which help us to understand how cooperation, how decision-making and prosocial behavior work?” This is how Gert Scobel of 3sat opened the introduction to Session 3 on Day 2. Lord Richard Layard of the London School of Economics, after discussing different situations where competition or cooperation would be more appropriate, talked about how increased wealth does not correlate with increased happiness. Many people are stuck in a world of ‘social comparisons,’ where status is more important than being economically comfortable. He emphasized that while wealth is increasing, mental health is on the decline; and to combat this he introduced the Movement for Happiness to try to both increase happiness and reduce misery in the world. The Dalai Lama agreed to support the movement – “But don’t expect money!”

His Holiness and Participants at Mind & Life XX

Photo Courtesy of Manuel Bauer

His Holiness asked, “Why is it that I’ve seen studies where the level of happiness is higher in Cuba than in the United Kingdom?” Lord Layard said that it may result from greater cooperation among the members of Cuba’s society, a necessity in such a poor country. Lord Layard polled the audience to see if they thought that people in general can be trusted. Overwhelmingly the answer was yes. His Holiness laughed, “In this hall, the people are very good, very trusting. People outside this hall, I don’t know!”

Later His Holiness remarked, “The G7, the G20, none of these groups are focused on happiness. We need more cooperation based on trust, on respect, on love. ‘I need you.’ We must base our interactions on that idea. ‘I want happiness, and I need you. We need they. You must first extend your hand to others; you cannot wait for people to come to you for cooperation. This is most important.”

William Harbaugh of the University of Oregon started by explaining how current economic systems have self-correcting measures built in. Self-interest is a reliable strategy as goods are produced and distributed; and as rules are enforced to prevent one from harming others, the threat of punishment will keep actors in line, serving their self-interest. Welfare of the poor is not a market good, it is a public good. We should develop ‘warm-glow’ altruism to gain both external profit for those in need of the public good and internal profit by getting neural benefit. Pure altruism, where nothing is gained, may not work in an economic system; but ‘warm-glow’ altruism, where you know it will produce a feeling of satisfaction by directly helping others, is very effective and will compel people to want to do it again.

MLXX Banner and Flowers“What does altruism do for us?” Ernst Fehr asked as he returned to the stage. Public goods, as he defined, can be consumed by all members of a group, regardless of whether they contribute to them. Democratic liberty, the environment, etc. – these are examples of public goods. There is an undersupply of public goods in the world if people act selfishly. “Why do people start out acting altruistically, especially in these trust experiment games you perform?” asked His Holiness. “Many people start out very optimistic about others, but after witnessing selfishness in others, their altruism diminishes to the point where it almost ceases to exist,” replied Ernst. How can we solve this problem? Altruistic sanctioning of non-cooperation – the ability to punish those who act selfishly and harm others. Once it is introduced into the arena, cooperation immediately soars and becomes almost universal.

Session 4
Antoinette Hunziker-Ebneter, CEO of Forma Futura Invest Inc., declared the we, all of us, are responsible for our economic system, and the problems that arise out of it. Do we want to create a better system, with more sustainable outcomes, with more focus on people’s good, rather than materialism and selfishness? People are starting to question investment strategies to find stocks that coincide with their personal worldview. We are seeing a shift from a desire for quantity to quality, from pure profit to profit with a purpose. Intangible benefits need more prominence such as health, freedom of choice, etc. Revolution, rather than evolution, is necessary, as time is not in our favor to wait for the sustainable financial system to organically arise. Part of the solution is to invest in the companies that support our endgoal of compassion and altruism.

“I think human intelligence can and should be applied to working on solutions like this,” remarked His Holiness. “Material development can only grow so far, so there should eventually be a sense of contentment with where we end up. However, mental development should never be content.”

Arthur Vayloyan, of Credit Suisse, asked, “What can a bank do to help reduce poverty in the world?” Microfinance (not just microcredit) is part of the solution; it is defined as providing all basic, classical financial services for the poor. From his team’s beginning, investing in very small projects such as a woman in Cambodia who started with a loan of $13, Credit Suisse and other institutions have helped bring the size of microfinance to current global investments of about $45 billion. But aid alone, especially from governments and NGOS, will not do the job; throwing money at a problem without a very clear strategy will only pollute the problem. No one believed that this sort of venture would work. Arthur quoted Nelson Mandela – “It always seems impossible until it is done.”

Sanjit “Bunker” Roy conveyed his inspiring personal story with his time. After an expensive education, he was inspired to abandon the prospects of a well-to-do life upon visiting a poor village for the first time. He started the Barefoot College, an institution built by the poor, staffed by the poor, and dedicated to the education of the poor. No one with formal education is allowed. The policy is to visit destitute villages around the world, searching for people to train to become solar engineers. Only women are allowed. “Because we have found men are untrainable.” Bunker asked if His Holiness agreed with this conclusion. “Yes,” he said. “I am a lost cause.” Grandmothers, in particular, are ideal for this. At the Barefoot College, they are taught by sign language and by example how to build, repair, and maintain solar panels. “With solar panels, the Indian women we train are so precise, not like normal Indian women. They are not always so precise.” His Holiness joked, “Also Tibetan women!” After they are ready, they return to the village and install units around their village, at the cost of $2 per month. This has allowed the solar electrification of 600 villages in India alone.

Ernst Fehr and Lord Richard Layard in conversation

Ernst Fehr and Lord Richard Layard in conversation

“Real transformation comes from villages and projects like this. Change must come from the bottom,” His Holiness mused. Responding to a question about how this will affect migration to urban areas, Bunker said, “Develop the quality of life in villages, and this will prevent people from moving away to the cities.”

Matthieu Ricard finished the session with a brief few comments about humanitarian work. It is growing everywhere, especially on small scale projects. Non-government organizations can tease altruistic cooperation out of the groups and cultures they touch. They should confederate to continue and increase this very important work.

Thus ended a rousing day of dialogue. Immediately following the day’s proceedings, all the participants except His Holiness huddled together to begin formulating the last session, an integration of the ideas we have been presented with and as well a compass for the direction we want to follow going forward. Tomorrow will be a grand day!

ML XX - Day 1

Friday, April 9th, 2010

After watching a great first day, I have taken some notes to share with the rest of you out there - enjoy!

mli-title_session1

Session 1
Introductory remarks by Adam Engle, CEO and co-founder of the Mind & Life Institute, kicked off ML XX: Altruism and Compassion in Economics Systems. Rektor Andreas Fischer – the President of the University of Zurich – welcomed everyone and introduced the Dalai Lama. His Holiness then took the stage and stated flatly, “I do not know how to make money. But I know it can be useful.” He relayed a story where he asked one of his business friends about the roots of the current economic crisis, and his friend told him it was greed, possibly even the desire to cheat for profit. “Even I know this is bad for the economic system,” His Holiness said. He also spoke of a wish for all of us to continue striving for enhanced wisdom, and pondered whether the results of this conference may point toward a better direction for economic systems.

Roshi Joan Halifax, of Upaya Zen Center, outlined the direction of the conference and handed it over to the presenters. Dan Batson, of the University of Kansas, opened with a very direct question – Does altruism exist? After speaking about egoism and empathy, he referenced empathy-based experiments and what they might infer. Tania Singer, of the University of Zurich, explained two neural routes to understanding others’ minds – via empathy and compassion and via the “theory of mind,” the conscious thinking of someone else’s mental state. After explaining neural networks and their relation to compassionate thoughts and feelings, she talked of how some people have a deficit in comprehending their own feelings. Studies of meditation have been shown to help this deficiency. Richard Davidson, of the University of Wisconsin, followed up on these ideas and posited two big points – that there are different levels of empathy and compassion in people which have biological roots, and empathy and compassion can be regarded as skills which can be trained and enhanced. He then reviewed neuroscientific research in these areas; results showed that subjects who had more extensive mental training had a greater tendency to exhibit signs of altruism. Matthieu Ricard, of Shechen Monastary, presented last and helped enlighten the audience to Buddhist notions of compassion, empathy and altruism. For example, compassion is the desire to help alleviate suffering in others, whatever it may be.

mli-title_session2

Session 2
The afternoon session began with Joan Silk of UCLA, who defined altruism biologically, as seen in other species. Research has shown that altruism is common and beneficial in many species. As humans develop during childhood, they trend away from this commonality in other species.

One notable exchange during the conversation with His Holiness went as follows. “Does hostility come from not being connected? For instance, if bees from one colony are mixed with bees from another colony, do they see each other as alien or other?” Joan replied, “There doesn’t seem to be much flexibility in their behavior, though I do not know much of bees. So the ‘outgroup’ or ‘other’ perspective seems to remain intact.” His Holiness mused, “Does biological altruism require the ability to appreciate others? Mosquitoes, I think, have no appreciation! One may land on me, and I let it feed. But then it flies away and shows no appreciation!”

Ernst Fehr of the University of Zurich then talked about how true altruism in humans is rare, as we normally want or expect benefit for our costs, especially within economics. He defined altruism as actions to benefit an ‘other,’ but at cost to the actor and with no envisioned gain for the actor at the outcome, except possibly psychological benefit like happiness. Tania Singer then spoke about 3 motivational systems in the human brain: incentive-focused, threat-focused, and non-wanting-affiliation-focused. She talked of experiments to increase trust among individuals. John Dunne, of Emory University, explained compassion and altruism from the Buddhist perspective as they might relate to economics. One of the ultimate goals is happiness, so what are the costs and resources needed to attain that goal? The resources are internal, and thus of the highest value. If we can realign our priorities to focus on maintaining and enhancing our internal resources, we may see a shift toward a better economic system. He spoke of a Buddhist technique of internalizing the idea that all sentient beings were at some point your mother in a previous life; you can extend the feeling or connection you have with your mother to all beings. “Not that everyone has the greatest connection with their mother, but you understand what I mean,” John said. “I had a GOOD mother, though, just to be clear.” “So did I,” laughed His Holiness.

So, today was a ground-laying time of concepts and large ideas, setting us up for tomorrow, which will start exploring possibilities of where we go and of applied economics to further some of these ideas.

ML XX: Ready for Day 1

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

After an intense day of discussion, the participants of Mind & Life XX: Altruism and Compassion in Economic Systems are ready for the opening of the conference tomorrow.  After so many months of preparation, the day has come to share with His Holiness and the audience the research and ideas that have been percolating.  We expect rousing dialogue among the participants and His Holiness to be the highlight of each of these 5 sessions.  Tomorrow’s sessions are “Compassion, Empathy, Altruism, and Prosocial Behavior” and “Evolutionary Origins and Modern Expressions.”

After a celebratory dinner with gold sponsors this evening, spirits are high with expectations to match. I’ll have more tomorrow evening.

Mind & Life XX - Live from Switzerland

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Hey all,  I know it’s been a long time, but ML XX: Altruism and Compassion in Economics begins tomorrow here in Zurich, Switzerland.  All the participants have arrived.  Some are Mind and Life veterans, including Richie Davidson, Matthieu Ricard, Roshi Joan Halifax and John Dunne; others are all new to our dialogues - Joan Silk, Bunker Roy, Bill Harbaugh and Ernst Fehr, among many others.  It promises to be a series of really interesting conversations over the next few days.  The website for the conference is www.compassionineconomics.org.  For those of you in the vicinity of Zurich, we’ve still got tickets and would love to have you join us!

His Holiness landed yesterday and will be celebrating several events while he’s here, such as the 50th anniversary of Switzerland taking in and sheltering Tibetan refugees.  We are blessed as always to have so much of his time.

Today all the participants of the conference will huddle together and go over the finer details of how the session dialogues will go.  That’s all for now - got to get to work!

Nawang Khechog - Be Kind to Each Other

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

The Varela Awardees at 2009 SRI

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

Ringu Tulku on Self-NoSelf

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

Nawang Khechog and Adam Engle set the tone for 2009 Summer Research Institute

Thursday, June 11th, 2009